Re: [new] databases/pgtap (and databases/p5-TAP-Parser-SourceHandler-pgTAP dep)

On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 09:17:49AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 10:46:00AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here are two new ports, one for pgtap (https://pgtap.org/) and one for
> > TAP::Parser::SourceHandler::pgTAP which provides the pg_prove script,
> > used to run the regress tests for the upcoming 3.0.0 version of
> > geo/pgrouting.
> >
> > pgtap is a postgresql extension to run regress tests using the TAP framework.
> >
> > thanks to the nice testing bits from postgresql.port.mk, i can easily
> > run the pgtap tests themselves, and only some of them fail due to
> > user/ownership issues that i think cant be worked around on OpenBSD,
> > since we run build bits with fixed users (be it with PORTS_PRIVSEP or
> > not):
> >
> > # Failed test 1: "db_owner_is(db, user, desc) should pass"
> > # have: false
> > # want: true
> > # Failed test 3: "db_owner_is(db, user, desc) should have the proper diagnostics"
> > # have: have: landry
> > # want: postgres
> > # want:
> > # Failed test 4: "db_owner_is(db, user) should pass"
> > # have: false
> > # want: true
> > # Failed test 6: "db_owner_is(db, user) should have the proper diagnostics"
> > # have: have: landry
> > # want: postgres
> > # want:
> > # Failed test 12: "db_owner_is(db, non-user) should have the proper diagnostics"
> > # have: have: landry
> > # want: __not__postgres
> > # want: have: postgres
> > # want: __not__postgres
> > # Looks like you failed 5 tests of 411
> > Failed 5/411 subtests
> >
> > looking for feedback from the pgsql wizards (or perl wizards even!) and oks to
> > import.
>
> Anyone ? Would like to move forward with pgrouting 3.0, and those two ports
> will allow me fixing regress tests. And pgtap could be used by other pg*
> ports..
>
> Landry

I'll have a look. Wizard in neither, but user of both.
I also have a port I'm working on with testing problems.


--
Chris Bennett