Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

On 2020/07/29 09:36, Austin Hook wrote:
>
> Probably got my packages messed up at some point, and should just stop
> doing endless "upgrades", and start clean with 6.7, but for learning
> purposes and perspective, would appreciate tips on why doing a pkg_add of
> firefox under 6.6 would fail, while looking for a version of atk that that
> is not in the packages for 6.6?
>
>
> farm# pkg_add firefox
> quirks-3.187 signed on 2020-05-19T14:41:48Z
> Can't install firefox-72.0.2 because of libraries
> |library atk-1.0.21809.3 not found
> ...
>
> But looking at:
>
> https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.6/packages/amd64/
>
> I only see: atk-2.... and no atk-1....

atk-1.0.21809.3 reported by pkg_add in the "library not found" line refers
to the library version (file /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.21809.3) not the
package version (this library is contained in the atk-2.32.0 package).
>
> -------------------------- <clip> ----------------------
> at-spi2-core-2.32.1.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 258681
> atari800-4.1.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 408617
> atf-0.18p3.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 1129085
> atk-2.32.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 461597
> atk2mm-2.28.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 1238387
> atlas-0.4.3.1p10.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 2360270
> atomicparsley-0.9.6p3.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 138835
> --------------------------- </clip> -----------------------
>
> I realize that there are dependencies of dependencies going on here. but
> for perspective, why wouldn't atk-1... exist in the same package
> repository as the 6.6 version of firefox does, if that version (or
> probably it's other dependencies) requires it. Wouldn't package testing
> have failed for firefox when it was tested for 6.6? And if not, why not?
>
> Thanks in advance, for any comment.
>
> Austin Hook
>
>
>
>
>
>

Could you show the full output from these please?

echo $PKG_PATH
cat /etc/installurl
pkg_add -u
pkg_info