Re: Killing gpg1

On 9/5/20 1:25 PM, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've been talking about trying to remove security/gnupg (i.e. gpg
> version 1) for some time, and the recent plist clash has given me the
> kick up the butt I needed to look more seriously at this.
>
> Below is a list of things that still depend upon gpg1, by maintainer, as
> determined by:
>
> select fullpkgpath from ports where build_depends glob '*security/gnupg[^2]*' or run_depends glob '*security/gnupg[^2]*' order by maintainer;
>
> Let's see if we can move these to gpg2. I'll start by working my way
> through the ports with no maintainer. I'd appreciate it if maintainers
> could help out with their ports.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> bluhm@:
> security/p5-Module-Signature
>
> giovanni@:
> databases/mysql-zrm
> mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
>
both SpamAssassin and mysql-zrm works woth gpg2.

> feinerer@:
> security/fwknop
>
> robert@:
> www/rt
>
> semarie@:
> www/weboob
>
> solene@:
> mail/mailpile
>
> No maintainer:
> mail/pine-pgp-filters
> security/py-gnupg
> security/py-gnupg,python3
> security/clamav-unofficial-sigs
>