> On Sep 3, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Ernest Stewart <erneststewart77@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 15:07 AM, Brian Brombacher <brian@planetunix.net> wrote:
>
> "Your setup ... requires pf \rules and additional routing tables to make this work."
>
> And which pf rules and how to establish those routing tables are exactly what I'm asking.
Ernest,
You are not providing any justification for your ridiculous demands.
Again: Why are you trying to wire the network with the same and disjoint networks? You are not getting to the root cause of the problem. You want to solve a problem that everyone in the thread keeps telling you is not a problem to be solved without CLEAR JUSTIFICATION.
Hire a consultant, as Theo said. You're request for help, without proper justification, is not amenable to this mailing list.
-Brian
>
> But ok, let's say I reassign addresses so Comp1 re1= 192.168.3.2, Comp2 re0= 192.168.3.127, Comp2 re1 = 192.168.3.128 and Comp5 re0= 192.168.3.129, with all the proper netmasks. That still does not explain why Comp2 is receiving icmp.reply packets but not delivering them to "ping".
No comments:
Post a Comment