Re: UPDATE: GCC 8.4.0

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 01:20:16PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:59:23PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 11:20:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2020/08/18 13:10, Brad Smith wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 03:58:12AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> > > > > Here is a start at an update to GCC 8.4.0.
> >
> > What will be the status of gfortran? Currently, on OpenBSD 6.7,
> > in order to get a functioning gfortran I have to install lapack from ports
> > and use /usr/ports/pobj/lapack-3.8.0/bin/gfortran
>
> This is a small shell wrapper around /usr/local/bin/egfortran from the
> g95 package (g95-8.3.0p5 on OpenBSD 6.7-stable):
>
> $ cat /usr/ports/pobj/lapack-3.8.0/bin/gfortran
> #!/bin/sh
> exec /usr/local/bin/egfortran -B /usr/ports/pobj/lapack-3.8.0/bin "$@"
>
>
> $ pkg_info -c g95
> Information for https://ftp.hostserver.de/pub/OpenBSD//snapshots/packages/amd64/g95-8.3.0p7.tgz
>
> Comment:
> GNU compiler collection: f95 compiler
>
>
> To find packages, I recommend using the pkglocatedb package.
>
> $ doas pkg_add pkglocatedb
> $ pkglocate gfortran

still, it leaves in the open the question of installing (e)gfortran.

I got egfortran built from source (as a part of gcc-8.3.0) in the process of installation of
math/lapack
Do you say that a binary package for (e)gfortan does not exist? Why is the package gfortran obsolete?

> would likely have led you there.

still confused,
Dima