Saturday, October 31, 2020

Re: assembler error on trying to port OpenBLAS

On 10/31/20 9:48 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 10/31/2020 12:57 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>> On 10/29/20 8:25 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm trying to port OpenBLAS to the tree and am currently getting
>>> some weird assembler errors (port makefile is attached at end math/openblas)
>>>
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c: Assembler messages:
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:37: Error: no such instruction: `vbroadcastss (%rcx),%ymm0'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:38: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups (%rdx,%rax,4),%ymm8'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:39: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 32(%rdx,%rax,4),%ymm9'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:40: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 64(%rdx,%rax,4),%ymm10'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:41: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 96(%rdx,%rax,4),%ymm11'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:42: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups (%rsi,%rax,4),%ymm4'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:43: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 32(%rsi,%rax,4),%ymm5'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:44: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 64(%rsi,%rax,4),%ymm6'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:45: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 96(%rsi,%rax,4),%ymm7'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:51: Error: no such instruction: `vmulps %ymm4,%ymm0,%ymm4'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:52: Error: no such instruction: `vaddps %ymm8,%ymm4,%ymm12'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:53: Error: no such instruction: `vmulps %ymm5,%ymm0,%ymm5'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:54: Error: no such instruction: `vaddps %ymm9,%ymm5,%ymm13'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:55: Error: no such instruction: `vmulps %ymm6,%ymm0,%ymm6'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:56: Error: no such instruction: `vaddps %ymm10,%ymm6,%ymm14'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:57: Error: no such instruction: `vmulps %ymm7,%ymm0,%ymm7'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:58: Error: no such instruction: `vaddps %ymm11,%ymm7,%ymm15'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:59: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups (%rdx,%rax,4),%ymm8'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:60: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 32(%rdx,%rax,4),%ymm9'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:61: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 64(%rdx,%rax,4),%ymm10'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:62: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 96(%rdx,%rax,4),%ymm11'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:63: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups (%rsi,%rax,4),%ymm4'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:64: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 32(%rsi,%rax,4),%ymm5'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:65: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 64(%rsi,%rax,4),%ymm6'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:66: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups 96(%rsi,%rax,4),%ymm7'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:67: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups %ymm12,-128(%rdx,%rax,4)'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:68: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups %ymm13,-96(%rdx,%rax,4)'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:69: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups %ymm14,-64(%rdx,%rax,4)'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:70: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups %ymm15,-32(%rdx,%rax,4)'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:75: Error: no such instruction: `vmulps %ymm4,%ymm0,%ymm4'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:76: Error: no such instruction: `vmulps %ymm5,%ymm0,%ymm5'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:77: Error: no such instruction: `vmulps %ymm6,%ymm0,%ymm6'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:78: Error: no such instruction: `vmulps %ymm7,%ymm0,%ymm7'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:79: Error: no such instruction: `vaddps %ymm8,%ymm4,%ymm12'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:80: Error: no such instruction: `vaddps %ymm9,%ymm5,%ymm13'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:81: Error: no such instruction: `vaddps %ymm10,%ymm6,%ymm14'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:82: Error: no such instruction: `vaddps %ymm11,%ymm7,%ymm15'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:83: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups %ymm12,-128(%rdx,%rax,4)'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:84: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups %ymm13,-96(%rdx,%rax,4)'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:85: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups %ymm14,-64(%rdx,%rax,4)'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:86: Error: no such instruction: `vmovups %ymm15,-32(%rdx,%rax,4)'
>>> ../kernel/x86_64/saxpy_microk_sandy-2.c:87: Error: no such instruction: `vzeroupper '
>>>
>>>
>>> Presumably this is happening due to the assembler being used is
>>> the one from base as we don't build the ports egcc with gas for
>>> anything except aarch64 and arm.
>>> I'm kind of stumped here as it seems like using gfortran sets the
>>> compiler to egcc (compiling the above file with cc works).
>>> Is it possible to mix gfortran with base-clang C compiler?
>>> Another (possible) solution would be to build egcc all archs with
>>> the new gas assembler, but that sounds a lot more dangerous and I
>>> don't know enough to know if that is possible/or even a good idea/
>>> or if it will even work :-/
>>>
>>> Any pointers would be cool to have.
>>> (I've cc'ed pascal@ as they are the maintainer for gcc port and
>>> can be better suited to answer the second point of gas)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aisha
>>>
>>>
>>> # $OpenBSD $
>>>
>>> COMMENT    =    optimized BLAS/LAPACK library based on GotoBLAS
>>> PKGNAME =    ${DISTNAME:L}
>>> CATEGORIES =    math
>>>
>>> GH_ACCOUNT =    xianyi
>>> GH_PROJECT =    OpenBLAS
>>> GH_TAGNAME =    v0.3.12
>>>
>>> SHARED_LIBS =    openblas 0.0 \
>>>          blas 7.2 \
>>>          cblas 7.2 \
>>>          lapack 7.2 \
>>>          lapacke 7.2
>>>
>>> MAINTAINER =    Aisha Tammy <openbsd@aisha.cc>
>>>
>>> # BSD
>>> PERMIT_PACKAGE =    Yes
>>>
>>> WANT_LIB +=    c m pthread
>>>
>>> MODULES =    fortran
>>> MODFORTRAN_COMPILER =    gfortran
>>>
>>> USE_GMAKE =    Yes
>>>
>>> MAKE_ENV =    CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" FFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" \
>>>          LIBopenblas_VERSION="${LIBopenblas_VERSION}" \
>>>          LIBblas_VERSION="${LIBblas_VERSION}" \
>>>          LIBcblas_VERSION="${LIBcblas_VERSION}" \
>>>          LIBlapack_VERSION="${LIBlapack_VERSION}" \
>>>          LIBlapacke_VERSION="${LIBlapacke_VERSION}" \
>>>          USE_THREAD=1 USE_OPENMP=0 \
>>>          NUM_PARALLEL=8 \
>>>          NUM_THREADS=64 \
>>>          MAKE_NB_JOBS=-1 \
>>>          DYNAMIC_ARCH=1 \
>>>          TARGET=GENERIC \
>>>          NO_AFFINITY=1 \
>>>          NO_STATIC=0 \
>>>          BUILD_RELAPACK=1
>>>
>>> .include <bsd.port.mk>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the people who commented.
>> I've managed to fix the error by forcing the
>> COMPILER_LINKS = cc /usr/bin/cc gcc /usr/bin/gcc
>
> But that's not an option for something that is to be commited to the tree.
>

Well damn...
Is there any other method to fix the compiler to cc instead of
this?
I tried adding the lang/clang module before the fortran module
MODULES = lang/clang fortran
but that fixes the compiler to /usr/local/bin/clang instead of the
/usr/bin/clang.
I am not sure what else to try right now :(

Thanks,
Aisha

No comments:

Post a Comment