Re: replace security/stegcracker with security/stegseek

On 2021/02/01 07:48, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, Januar 29, 2021 19:22 CET, schrieb Klemens Nanni <kn@openbsd.org>:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > > for the quirks, just use reason 3: "no longer maintained upstream"
> > > or add a new one: "no longer maintained upstream, suggest stegseek" ?
> > Just add new ones if need be, no need to be less specific.
> >
>
> Will do thanks,
>
> > But if one replaces the other, why not merge the old into the new one
> > and keep users on track?
>
> you mean to place the stegseek port into the stegcracker directory?
> Or is there an easy way with @conflict etc. markers in PLIST ?

To do this, you will need:

- EPOCH=0 on stegseek because the version number is "higher" than that
of stegcracker

- quirks $stem_extensions entry to rename the package

- @pkgpath security/stegcracker in stegseek/pkg/PLIST


>
> cheers,
> Sebastian
>