Hi Stuart,
As far as I understand, this means if the person writes to you, you were
intended recipient, and
if it was forwarded by someone else you should delete it and then flash
yourself with the MIB
pencil afterwards.
Regards
Jean-François
Le 14/06/2021 à 08:15, Stuart Longland a écrit :
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 16:15:50 +0000
> fern.tjeers@aiyja.com wrote:
>
>> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments to it, are confidential and privileged to Etheria Services and Etheria Group, within the European Union, and this includes its sister companies, and to the correct recipients of this email, which are directly applicable to GDPR regulations, and only confidential use of that designated recipient(s) named above in this email may receive the contents herein. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful and can result in heavy fines relative to your company's income. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message along with all attachments. We give no rights to any reader of this email, to sell or forward our employee or company details on, to any third party, without specific written request
> Stupid question, but _why_ are we sending this to a public mailing list
> if it's confidential? I can guarantee the email _will_ be seen by
> people _not_ listed as "correct recipients" because it can be seen by
> theoretically **anyone**.
>
> Secondly, isn't it a bit late to tell me _now_ that your email is
> confidential _after_ I have read the body in full? I don't know how
> people read emails in the European Union, but here in Australia, I
> start at the top and read to the bottom, not bottom to top (maybe that
> explains the business world's like for top-posting).
>
> That is how I was taught to read when I was learning to read in primary
> school back in the early 90s, and how I continue to read English text
> today: I know the law is an ass best ridden backwards, but I didn't
> think "backwards" is how I was meant to read legal documents too!
>
> Thirdly, how I am I meant to "destroy" the copies, assuming I am not a
> "correct recipient" (which, by the way, is not defined). If this means
> destruction of the physical storage devices, do I get compensated by
> Etheria Group for the 5× 2TB HDDs and 4× 2TB SSDs, any of which "may"
> be "storing" in part or in full, the very email they want "destroyed"?
>
> And what comes of all the _other_ data I have sharing those storage
> volumes that your footer so forcefully asserts should be cast to the
> bit bucket? It's a nice gesture publicly thanking the OpenBSD authors
> for their hard efforts, but legal fashion be damned, I strongly object
> to the demands made in your email's footer.
No comments:
Post a Comment