Re: sysutils/bat

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:15:23AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@usta.de> wrote:
>
> > Theo de Raadt wrote on Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 09:12:58AM -0600:
> > > Ian Darwin <ian@darwinsys.com> wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 04:47:46PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> >
> > >>>> Changes by: sthen@cvs.openbsd.org 2021/07/27 05:55:36
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Modified files:
> > >>>> sysutils/bat : Makefile
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Log message:
> > >>>> set sysutils/bat to ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=${LP64_ARCHS}, one of the 147
> > >>>> dependencies (sys-info) has a 32 vs 64 bit issue when checking
> > >>>> the number of CPUs online
> >
> > >>> Wait, a cat with 147 dependencies? Looks like it's a rabbit after all!
> > >>> At least there can be no doubt that it inhabits a rabbit hole, doesn't it?
> > >>>
> > >>> Besides, isn't a program that stops working once your machine has
> > >>> more than four billion CPUs utterly useless in the 31st century?
> > >>>
> > >>> If it didn't constantly trip up otherwise busy porters, this port
> > >>> would be a really good laugh.
> > >>>
> > >>> *Looking at the calendar*
> > >>> No, it's unlikely to be the Easter bunny.
> > >>> We are not that close to Apil 1.
> >
> > >> And to think that Rob Pike once wrote a paper "cat -v considered harmful"
> > >> since it added unnecessary functionality to cat, whose only job is
> > >> to catenate files...
> >
> > > bat is my favorite rust program
> > >
> > > please continue maintaining it in ports,
> > > i don't want the standup comedy to end
> >
> > I didn't mean to summon tedu@ regarding the port,
> > quite to the contary, i might even contribute to it!
> >
> > https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/pull/1756
>
> I won't use bat until it has an emacs mode.
>

I thought the classic indication of maturity was when it sprouted a full LISP interpreter.

.... Ken