Re: [new] devel/libfixposix

Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> writes:

> On 2021/12/03 10:20, Omar Polo wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> writes:
>>
>> > On 2021/12/03 09:07, Omar Polo wrote:
>> >> Hello ports,
>> >>
>> >> % pkg_info libfixposix
>> >> Information for inst:libfixposix-0.4.3
>> >>
>> >> Comment:
>> >> thin wrapper over POSIX syscalls
>> >>
>> >> Description:
>> >> The purpose of libfixposix is to offer replacements for parts of POSIX
>> >> whose behaviour is inconsistent across *NIX flavours.
>> >>
>> >> Maintainer: The OpenBSD ports mailing-list <ports@openbsd.org>
>> >>
>> >> WWW: https://github.com/sionescu/libfixposix
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> there are some common lisp libraries that depends on this. I ported it
>> >> around one year ago because I needed it for a x11/stumpwm extension, but
>> >> there were issues with the common lisp library iolib. These issues were
>> >> fixed recently, so here's the port.
>> >>
>> >> OK?
>> >>
>> >> P.S.: only one doubt: the port is written in C99 which should be ok for
>> >> base-gcc right?
>> >>
>> >
>> > : CONFIGURE_STYLE = gnu autoreconf
>> >
>> > s/gnu //, and please set AUTOCONF_VERSION/AUTOMAKE_VERSION to something less
>> > of an antique than the defaults.
>>
>> Sure!
>>
>> Here's an updated tarball with CONFIGURE_STYLE=autoreconf and
>>
>> AUTOCONF_VERSION=2.71
>> AUTOMAKE_VERSION=1.16
>>
>
> Nitpicking but I'm not a fan of mixing "VAR=" and "VAR =" in the same
> Makefile, other than that OK with me.

completely agree, I was in a hurry and copy-pasted the output of `env |
grep -i auto'

I'll import it later with the proper spacing and alignment, thanks :)