On 2021/12/31 06:51, Andrew Krasavin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This is another dependency for our telegram-desktop port (more
> accurately, for tg_owt port). It seems more correct to get the shared
> library as a separate port, that's why we refused to use the bundled
> version.
>
> Keep in mind that Google supplies libyuv primarily as part of
> Chromium and maintains build correctness only for the static library.
> Unfortunately, it seems that these are not just words. For example,
> one can observe this:
Given what you've said about libyuv, I think this approach could be
problematic and that it makes more sense to use the bundled copy.
As well as avoiding the problems you've mentioned, it reduces the
risk of it interfering with build of the chromium-based ports
(chromium/iridium/electron/qtwebengine) which won't expect a system copy
of this library/headers.
No comments:
Post a Comment