Edd Barrett wrote (2022-03-29 10:58 CEST):
> Hi,
>
> jca@ suggested that it may be a good idea to get the latest gnupg in before we
> lock.
>
> The update is simple and all tests pass on amd64.
>
> I note that npth and libgcrypt also have updates, but I don't think we should
> touch those so close to lock.
>
> I'm also dropping MAINTAINER. I don't use gpg any more.
Looks good to me.
OK sdk@
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/gnupg/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.123
> diff -u -p -r1.123 Makefile
> --- Makefile 11 Mar 2022 19:53:24 -0000 1.123
> +++ Makefile 29 Mar 2022 08:56:48 -0000
> @@ -1,14 +1,11 @@
> COMMENT = GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement
>
> -DISTNAME = gnupg-2.2.30
> +DISTNAME = gnupg-2.2.34
> CATEGORIES = security
> -REVISION = 0
>
> MASTER_SITES = ${MASTER_SITE_GNUPG:=gnupg/}
>
> HOMEPAGE = https://www.gnupg.org/
> -
> -MAINTAINER = Edd Barrett <edd@openbsd.org>
>
> # GPLv3+
> PERMIT_PACKAGE = Yes
> Index: distinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/gnupg/distinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.35
> diff -u -p -r1.35 distinfo
> --- distinfo 30 Aug 2021 17:04:45 -0000 1.35
> +++ distinfo 29 Mar 2022 08:36:26 -0000
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (gnupg-2.2.30.tar.bz2) = zGNtbiKmc5k9lIFMCb5GnfLOJ6DGaxyrOburF4bPIYQ=
> -SIZE (gnupg-2.2.30.tar.bz2) = 7215171
> +SHA256 (gnupg-2.2.34.tar.bz2) = ViozUNz2bLZ8WCXGf/LCkE2x4w7I4dNTrcFO+6mr9D8=
> +SIZE (gnupg-2.2.34.tar.bz2) = 7252882
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Edd Barrett
>
> https://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
>
No comments:
Post a Comment