I got clean builds of ghc, cabal-install and darcs and so far all of
them work as they are supposed to.
Unfortunately the dependencies of Elm and Purescript aren't yet updated
to build with 9.2.2 so I can't test my main use-case for having ghc
around, but that's obviously not a deficiency of the ports ;-)
What I can confirm is that cabal-install builds them fine up until the
expected build failures kick in ...
On 4/29/22 07:11, Greg Steuck wrote:
> I feel pretty good about where we are with ghc-9.2.2 (patches in
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=165103738516521&w=2). I just
> rebuilt all the directly dependent ports. I have been running the
> updated Haskell ports I use for the last couple of weeks.
>
> Furthermore I have a stash of packages that nobody else so far wanted in
> the tree. All but one of them (stack, not compatible upstream) built
> fine after quick updates. If anybody cares, these ports are in the usual
> place: https://github.com/blackgnezdo/ports/tree/hs-ports
>
> Once people test the patches to their satisfaction, we could update the
> tree.
>
> Thanks
> Greg
>
No comments:
Post a Comment