Saturday, July 30, 2022

Re: [UPDATE] lang/elixir 1.13.4

Hello Stuart,

thanks for the fast answer, Yes, then it works.

Regards,


Christoph


Am 30.07.22 um 15:15 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> The erlang.port.mk diff is also required for this one.
>
> --
>   Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
>
>
> On 30 July 2022 13:02:18 Christoph Roland Winter <me@the.floof.rocks> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> tried the patch using OpenBSD 7.2-beta (GENERIC.MP) #656: Thu Jul 28
>> 10:05:38 MDT 2022, amd64 and Erlang 25.0.3 from ports and got.
>>
>> Invalid MODERL_VERSION set: 25. (in lang/elixir)
>> Invalid MODERL_VERSION set: 25. (in lang/elixir)
>> Invalid MODERL_VERSION set: 25. (in lang/elixir)
>> Invalid MODERL_VERSION set: 25. (in lang/elixir)
>> Invalid MODERL_VERSION set: 25. (in lang/elixir)
>> Invalid MODERL_VERSION set: 25. (in lang/elixir)
>> Invalid MODERL_VERSION set: 25. (in lang/elixir)
>> ===>  Checking files for elixir-1.13.4
>> Invalid MODERL_VERSION set: 25. (in lang/elixir)
>>>> Fetch
>> https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/archive/v1.13.4/elixir-1.13.4.tar.gz
>>>> (SHA256) elixir-1.13.4.tar.gz: OK
>> ===> elixir-1.13.4 depends on: rebar-* - not found
>> ===>  Verifying install for rebar-* in devel/rebar
>> ===>  Checking files for rebar-2.6.4p2
>>>> Fetch https://github.com/rebar/rebar/archive/2.6.4/rebar-2.6.4.tar.gz
>>>> (SHA256) rebar-2.6.4.tar.gz: OK
>>>> Broken dependency: lang/erlang/ ends with / (DEPENDS was
>> lang/erlang/) in devel/rebar
>> *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/devel/rebar
>> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2293
>> '/usr/ports/pobj/rebar-2.6.4/.dep-lang-erlang-': @unset...)
>> *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/devel/rebar
>> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2705
>> '/usr/ports/pobj/rebar-2.6.4/.extract_done': @cd /usr/p...)
>> *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/devel/rebar
>> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2143
>> '/usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/rebar-2.6.4p2.tgz': @cd ...)
>> *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/devel/rebar
>> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2632 '_internal-package':
>> @case X${_DEPENDS_CACHE} in  X) _D...)
>> *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/devel/rebar
>> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2611 'package': @:; cd
>> /usr/ports/devel/rebar && PKGPATH=dev...)
>> *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/devel/rebar
>> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2164
>> '/var/db/pkg/rebar-2.6.4p2/+CONTENTS': @cd /usr/ports/d...)
>> *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/devel/rebar
>> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2611 'install':
>> @lock=rebar-2.6.4p2;  export _LOCKS_HELD=" e...)
>> *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2293
>> '/usr/ports/pobj/elixir-1.13.4/.dep-devel-rebar,': @unset
>> _DEPENDS_TARGET _M...)
>> *** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2705
>> '/usr/ports/pobj/elixir-1.13.4/.extract_done': @cd
>> /usr/ports/lang/elixir &&...)
>> *** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2143
>> '/usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/elixir-1.13.4.tgz': @cd
>> /usr/ports/lang/elixi...)
>> *** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2632
>> '_internal-package': @case X${_DEPENDS_CACHE} in  X) _DEPENDS_CACHE=$(
>> mktem...)
>> *** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2611
>> 'package': @:; cd /usr/ports/lang/elixir && PKGPATH=lang/elixir make
>> _intern...)
>> *** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2164
>> '/var/db/pkg/elixir-1.13.4/+CONTENTS': @cd /usr/ports/lang/elixir &&
>> PKGPATH...)
>> *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/lang/elixir
>> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2611 'install':
>> @lock=elixir-1.13.4;  export _LOCKS_HELD=" e...)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>>
>> Am 30.07.22 um 10:49 schrieb Volker Schlecht:
>>> Another bump.
>>>
>>> On 7/23/22 10:55, Volker Schlecht wrote:
>>>> bump
>>>>
>>>> On 7/16/22 11:26, Volker Schlecht wrote:
>>>>> Updates lang/elixir to 1.13.4
>>>>> Changes MODERL_VERSION to 25 (erlang21 is now unsupported)
>>>>> Requires rebar3 >= 3.19.0
>>>>> Requires the patched lang/erlang/erlang.port.mk
>>>>>
>>>>> Builds and tests fine on amd64
>>>
>

No comments:

Post a Comment