Re: current status of OCaml

Index: gnum4.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/m4/gnum4.c,v
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -p -r1.54 gnum4.c
--- gnum4.c 4 Jul 2022 10:41:21 -0000 1.54
+++ gnum4.c 7 Sep 2022 20:48:56 -0000
@@ -596,6 +596,11 @@ doformat(const char *argv[], int argc)
temp[1] = 0;
thisarg = temp;
break;
+ case 'd':
+ temp[0] = strtol(argv[pos++], NULL, 10);
+ temp[1] = 0;
+ thisarg = temp;
+ break;
default:
m4errx(1, "Unsupported format specification: %s.",
argv[2]);
Index: m4.1
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/m4/m4.1,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -p -r1.68 m4.1
--- m4.1 14 Jun 2022 21:31:45 -0000 1.68
+++ m4.1 7 Sep 2022 20:48:56 -0000
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ and following arguments, in a way simila
This built-in is only available in GNU-m4 compatibility mode, and the only
parameters implemented are there for autoconf compatibility:
left-padding flag, an optional field width, a maximum field width,
-*-specified field widths, and the %s and %c data type.
+*-specified field widths, and the %s, %c and %d data types.
.It Fn ifdef name yes no
If the macro named by the first argument is defined then return the second
argument, otherwise the third.
> The _nicest_ solution would be to add support to src/usr.bin/m4.

I'm waaay, waaay out of my comfort zone here, but shouldn't that do the
trick already?