Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 20:37 WET):
> here are some tweaks, it looks like it will be too much pain to turn
> it into a proper python.port.mk port but we can get a bit closer and use
> some more bits of the ports framework.
>
> I also wondered if it should it be installed (or aliased) to CodeChecker
> to match the case of the usage commands etc?
I don't have a hard opinion on this. Moritz preferred it lowercase and
I think it's more common, too. But the --help output and documentation
shows CodeChecker.
Attached is a codechecker version that incorporates sthens feedback and
also reworks the the file handling in a way I like even better.
I had to add PARALLEL_MAKE_FLAGS, because with sthens version of
ALL_TARGET = package package_api, make would try to build both targets
at the same time, which caused issues here and I had to "make" the port
twice for it to succeed.
Best Regards,
Stefan
No comments:
Post a Comment