23.01.2023 18:52, Hrvoje Popovski пишет:
> On 23.1.2023. 16:24, kasak wrote:
>> 22.01.2023 14:49, David Gwynne пишет:
>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 03:41:56PM +0300, kasak wrote:
>>>> Hello misc!
>>>>
>>>> I'm using bridge for integrating remote clients to my network with this
>>>> simple config:
>>>>
>>>> $ cat /etc/hostname.bridge0
>>>> add vether0
>>>> add em1
>>>> add tap1
>>>> up
>>>>
>>>> I see in this commit that veb is supposed to replace bridge
>>>> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=161405102019493&w=2
>>>>
>>>> Does it make sense to move to veb for me, or not?
>>>> There is approximately 150 clients on the "em1" side and 10 on "tap1"
>>> unless you're using pf to filter on em1 and tap1, then moving from
>>> bridge and vether to veb and vport is simple. veb can be a lot faster
>>> than bridge, so maybe that's a reason to try moving?
>>>
>>> dlg
>>>
>> I've followed your advice and failed :(
>>
>> I moved hostname.bridge0 to hostname.veb0, moved hostname.vether0 to
>> hostname.vport0
>>
>> and edit hostname.veb0 replacing add vether0 to add vport0
>>
>> after reboot i cannot reach veb0 network :( ping answer "the network is
>> down"
>>
>>
> Did you put "up" at the end of hostname.veb0 and maybe at the end of
> hostname.vport0 ?
>
>
Ah! There is was!
I forgot to add "up" to vport!
Now we know that it does not work without it :)
Thanks for help!
No comments:
Post a Comment