Final ping from my side in case anyone else is interested.
On 2/14/23 21:24, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> Alright, so here's the updated dune patch plus all the patches that need
> to go in alongside...
>
> As a reminder:
>
> - lablgtk3
> - ocaml-cppo
> - ocaml-graphics
> - ocaml-cairo
> - ocaml-yojson
>
> --> Trivial post-install changes, because dune now installs docs
> directly into the correct directories + results of running update-plist.
>
> - ocaml-pcre
>
> --> Same, but has nothing left depending on it, so just cvs rm'ing it
> might be an option, too.
>
> - ocaml-menhir
>
> --> builds on an already submitted patch:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=167314822610719&w=2
>
> Anyone interested?
>
> On 2/14/23 17:28, Yozo TODA wrote:
>>> Are we sure that we aren't bending over backwards here to "fix"
>>> something that isn't a bug, and thereby increase the chances of
>>> introducing problems elsewhere?
>>
>> I agree that we don't need to hustle to "fix".
>> in my update proposal patch, just omit the last three lines of
>> post-install target.
>>
>>> echo 'version = "${VERSION}"' >
>>> ${WRKINST}${LOCALBASE}/lib/ocaml/dune/META.new
>>> cat ${WRKINST}${LOCALBASE}/lib/ocaml/dune/META >>
>>> ${WRKINST}${LOCALBASE}/lib/ocaml/dune/META.new
>>> mv ${WRKINST}${LOCALBASE}/lib/ocaml/dune/META.new
>>> ${WRKINST}${LOCALBASE}/lib/ocaml/dune/META
>> -- yozo.
>>
No comments:
Post a Comment