On 01.04.23 15:02, Alexander Klimov wrote:
>
>
> On 30.03.23 19:39, Pavel Korovin wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I've already removed elasticsearch and kibana ports and updated beats
>> and logstash to the latest possible. Tested beats and logstash with
> "the latest possible" because of the new license? Can't both of them be
> built to pure OSS artifacts according to their LICENSE.txt?
Forget my question! I've mixed up pkg_add on a snapshot and installing
from -current ports. Didn't think that the versions there differ a lot.
>
>> opensearch, works fine.
Please could write a few bullets -kind of a test protocol- so that I can
reproduce your test? I'm already on the latest snapshot and installed
logstash and opensearch from -current ports, of course.
What I've done so far:
Logstash:
input{generator{}}
output {
elasticsearch {
index => "openbsd-%{+YYYY.MM.dd}"
manage_template => false
}
}
Opensearch:
plugins.security.disabled: true
compatibility.override_main_response_version: true
But logstash seems not to like the version info from opensearch.
I had to patch its build info detection and license detection locally.
>>
>> On 10/14, Omar Polo wrote:
>>> Now that we have a release with both elasticsearch and opensearch
>>> available (should be possible to do the migration althought i've never
>>> tried that), I'm ok with removing the elastic stack. Thank you for
>>> maintaining it!
>>>
>>> (it's a bit funny that the way to make kibana run we would have to
>>> disable a part that would infringe the license!)
>>
No comments:
Post a Comment