[maintainer update] print/ghostscript/gnu 10.01.2

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.126
diff -u -p -r1.126 Makefile
--- Makefile 12 Apr 2023 15:12:39 -0000 1.126
+++ Makefile 21 Jun 2023 16:40:40 -0000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
COMMENT = PostScript and PDF interpreter

-VERSION = 10.01.1
+VERSION = 10.01.2
DISTNAME = ghostscript-${VERSION}
EXTRACT_SUFX = .tar.xz
CATEGORIES = lang print
Index: distinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -p -r1.21 distinfo
--- distinfo 12 Apr 2023 15:12:39 -0000 1.21
+++ distinfo 21 Jun 2023 16:40:40 -0000
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (ghostscript-10.01.1.tar.xz) = yRGTY1qiV4+VCLi6hGEGweNwX70/7V/ZoBXyG1XxXWg=
-SIZE (ghostscript-10.01.1.tar.xz) = 67567268
+SHA256 (ghostscript-10.01.2.tar.xz) = SNB5JCosoCouR6dqUs36gYsq12nCurAK0El90TVg5+c=
+SIZE (ghostscript-10.01.2.tar.xz) = 67571808
ghostscript was just released as 10.01.2

No named security content (yet), but this commit is pretty explicit:

https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commit;h=9af4197bdccd4b65ed35a8ad2be075c3de2f0555

Overall, the diff is small and seems to be centered around getting the
fix mentioned above right:

https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/ghostpdl-10.01.2

tested on amd64.

ok?