Re: [new] textproc/htmlq

On Sun, 2023-06-11 at 09:31 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/06/10 21:13, lux wrote:
> > Hi ports@,
> >
> > htmlq is a like `jq' tool, but for HTML. Uses CSS selectors to
> > extract
> > bits of content from HTML files.
> >
> > Github: https://github.com/mgdm/htmlq
> >
> > I'm make a port, and test on AMD64 7.3, works fine for me:
> >
> > $ uname -a
> > OpenBSD openbsd 7.3 GENERIC.MP#1125 amd6
> > $ curl --silent www.openbsd.org | htmlq title
> > <title>OpenBSD</title>
> > $ curl --silent www.openbsd.org | htmlq --text title
> > OpenBSD
> > $ curl --silent 'https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#Download' |
> > htmlq --attribute href a | grep '\.iso'
> > https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.3/alpha/install73.iso
> > ...
> >
> > Known issues at compile time, cargo will generate a warning when it
> > is
> > compiled:
> >
> > > warning: the following packages contain code that will be
> > > rejected by
> > a future version of Rust: html5ever v0.25.1
> >
> > This warn is about trailing semicolons when using Rust macros
> > (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79813) and can be ignored
> > for
> > now.
> >
> > OK to import? Thank you.
>
> - Should use crates.inc not modules.inc
>
> - You have this...
>
> # for riscv64 and powerpc65, please keep: libc >= 0.2.113
> MODCARGO_CRATES_UPDATE =        libc
>
> but you didn't use an updated libc version in the MKDCARGO_CRATES
> lines
>
> (also typo, should be powerpc64)
>
> - there's a lot of repetition in pkg_info because you've included
> things
> in DESCR which are already printed - the contents of COMMENT, and the
> website URL which is added automatically from HOMEPAGE:
>
> $ pkg_info htmlq
> Information for inst:htmlq-0.4.0
>
> Comment:
> like jq, but for HTML
>
> Description:
> Like jq, but for HTML. Uses CSS selectors to extract bits of content
> from HTML files.
>
> For information about how to use this, see
> https://github.com/mgdm/htmlq.
>
> Maintainer: Xi Lu <lx@shellcodes.org>
>
> WWW: https://github.com/mgdm/htmlq
>
> - little request, I'd find it easier if you sent tar.gz rather than
> zip,
> vim's archive viewer is a little nicer for tar.gz (can show all files
> in a directory in one screen, rather than having to open them one by
> one, which makes it slightly faster to read through when reviewing)
>

Hi, I fixed, thank you.