On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:49:10PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> So emacs-29.1 introduced a tree-sitter backend to parse source code,
> instead of the traditional bag of ugly regexes. I'd like to add
> tree-sitter as a dep to the emacs port but the non-optional rust
> dependency is in the way. rust isn't supported on all architectures but
> emacs--no_x11 should be available everywhere. I initially went with
> a PFRAG.rust, but thinking about it some more, I don't want people to
> yell at me when they spot rust on the build dep list of emacs--no_x11. ;)
>
> Upstream says that "tree-sitter aims to be dependency-free so that the
> runtime library (which is written in pure C) can be embedded in any
> application.
>
> I propose to zap the rust build-dependency. Paco, you did the inital
> import. Do you still care about shipping this tree-sitter program?
> Edd, the only consumer of tree-sitter so far is neovim, which seems to
> build/package without the tree-sitter cli program being available.
> runtime/doc/treesitter.txt doesn't mention a requirement on the cli
> tool. Maybe you'll want to check again?
>
> If people actually use and need the tree-sitter program, we can create
> an additional tree-sitter-cli port (and maybe move the library to a
> textproc/tree-sitter/tree-sitter subdirectory, etc).
>
> ok?
> -
> -.include "crates.inc"
> -
crates.inc is removed from Makefile, but not rm'ed from the port dir -
is it intentional?
> -SEPARATE_BUILD = Yes
Mostly for educational purposes -
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/guide.html
point 13 says "Try setting SEPARATE_BUILD" - is there a reason to remove
it?
No comments:
Post a Comment