Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
>>> SHARED_LIBS += objfw 1.0
>>> SHARED_LIBS += objfwrt 1.0
>>> SHARED_LIBS += objfwtls 1.0
>> I can't remember how strict we are with these version starting numbers
>> but iirc we start with 0.1 (?) I don't really mind if this isn't changed.
>> The bumpings are the more important ones anyway.
> 0.0.
>
> The key thing is to make sure that changing the versions in SHARED_LIBS
> changes the versions of the produced file, i.e. make sure that ports is
> in control.
Ok, now I have questions :).
I was under the impression that the the SHARED_LIBS should match the .so
name? This would be the case with 1.0, as upstream used 0.0 during
development when there was no stable ABI/API (and users could have
installed such a pre-1.0 release manually on OpenBSD). I could find
https://man.openbsd.org/library-specs.7 which seems to indicate it must
match the .so name, as well as lining out rules on when and how to
update the version, which match upstream in this case (I can vouch for
this, as I am the upstream).
Given that, wouldn't it be better to have it 1.0 instead of always one
major version less than upstream?*
* Very, very early, there was a major version of as high as 8. But this
was a decade or so ago and I think nobody ever used it. And on a version
that was very much declared "this WILL break, don't use this for anything"
--
Jonathan
No comments:
Post a Comment