Johannes Thyssen Tishman:
> Subject says it all. I'm wondering if using the git conversion
> of the ports tree[0] is regarded as a good alternative to CVS for
> working with ports.
If you are more comfortable with Got[1] or Git, by all means use
them. sthen@ has already explained the limits of the conversion.
> Do any of you porters use it instead of CVS?
I've mostly switched to Got for all of OpenBSD, and treat CVS as
write-only. From the format of the patches flying around, it's
obvious that there are a number of committers that use Got or Git.
> [0] https://github.com/openbsd/ports
https://codeberg.org/OpenBSD/ports
[1] https://gameoftrees.org/
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
No comments:
Post a Comment