Saturday, March 30, 2024

Re: qwx0 / QCNFA765 Does 802.11g Only

4 <babut@yandex.ru>:

> dear, why didn't you write about it in man?


Thanks 4, to support the wide community of who still remain surprised
about the scarsity of the doc.

I personally have subscribed also "Then, why the man in XXI century interested group".
But probably having roman numbers I have been the only group member till now.

Is it we need a man secretary or an I'm-not-a-dev-for-sure small woman
without dev bubbles who is able to dishern doc for users?

Is it we need a good man alternative?
( I personally hate 555 man pages doc when most of us have one life only to set
a firewall by reccomended choices, indeed did you notices 'man sh' end ? )

Indeed, the prefance must be always a capital 'thanks' to all the devs and
a capital 'for your good will' versus having the possibility of a good
publishing business.

Mar 30, 2024 10:40:50 4 <babut@yandex.ru>:

> dear, why didn't you write about it in man?

No comments:

Post a Comment