On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:30:25 +0200,
"Souji Thenria" <mail@souji-thenria.net> wrote:
>
> Could you elaborate on your point that Go ports are a pain? I thought a
> port written in Go would probably be easier to maintain
> because no additional libraries are needed to run the program, and
> cross-compilation is relatively easy, too.
>
Just an example of a go port which creates some issue you may see
docker-compose.
It requires to be patched for some dependencies to fix syscalls, and an
update may requires additional patches.
Also, it is distributed without vendor folder that means it requires
internet access during the build.
So, instead I prepare vendor folder as the second artifact.
--
wbr, Kirill
No comments:
Post a Comment