On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 12:33:38PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 07.07.24 um 11:13 schrieb Theo Buehler:
> > Thanks. I see lots of changes in exported symbols that should usually
> > result in a major bump for libobjfw and libobjfwrt.
>
> Thanks for checking!
>
> > Is there some reason these bumps were left out?
>
> Yes, these were private symbols that were accidentally visible. Nothing
> should have used them.
Thanks for the explanations. I don't think intention is good enough to
avoid a bump. These are still symbols that were exported and that could
(in principle) have been used even if they are in a private header that
wasn't installed. I could agree if all the symbols had been in the
private namespace, but that's not the case here.
So unless there is a really strong reason not to, I would suggest we
bump the major of both libraries.
No comments:
Post a Comment