> Claudio Jeker <cjeker () diehard ! n-r-g ! com>:
>
> No, this is not right. rtables are part of rdomains. So rdomain 0 has
> rtable 0. rdomain 1 uses rtable 1. rdomain 2 uses rtable 2 and so on.
>
> Now it is possible to assign an extra rtable to an rdomain but as you
> found out there is no tool right now to allow this for any rdomain != 0.
>
> Doing this properly would probably require some new route(4) messages so
> that userland daemons can act on this as well. I never really needed this
> flexibility so I never implemented it.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=169814291705057&w=2
No comments:
Post a Comment