Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 04:48:34PM +0000, Anon Loli wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 09:45:37PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:38:30 +0200,
> > Zé Loff <zeloff@zeloff.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From your original message's headers, delivered to my mail server:
> > >
> > > Received: from mail.openbsd.org (mail.openbsd.org [199.185.178.25])
> > > by mail.phistat.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id 8914e035 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO)
> > > <zeloff@zeloff.org>;
> > > Sun, 29 Sep 2024 17:44:41 +0100 (WEST)
> > >
> >
> > Things is simpler, BTW:
> >
> > ~ $ host -t txt _dmarc.autistici.org
> > _dmarc.autistici.org descriptive text "v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; rua=mailto:live-reports@autistici.org"
> > ~ $
> >
> >
> > --
> > wbr, Kirill
>
> What does that mean?
>
> More important question: why is e-mail bloated and incorrect as it is? What is
> this fucking random-ass shit technology?
> Why do I even have to bother with this unnecessary bullshit?

That's funny, I just asked myself that very same question.

> Let's say that autistici.org has some sort of filter, why the fuck does it not
> check if SENDER_MAIL and RECEIVER_MAIL match and just not ban my own ass? ._.
>
> Kirill told me in a private e-mail that I banned myself?
> How the fuck did I ban myself? Have I this entire time been tempbanned by
> autistici.org, the e-mail service which I use, rather than the OpenBSD
> moderators?

Instead of lobbing banning and censorship accusations back and forth,
just check the archives:

https://marc.info/?w=2&r=1&s=anon+loli&q=a

If its there, the list(s) got it. If you didn't, that's your problem.

I'm not sure if this is what Kirill meant, but you might want to do a
quick search for "mailing lists and DMARC" and do some reading. In
short, when you send an email to a mailing list, the list's server
probably rewrites some headers, which breaks DKIM, if the original
message had it, and probably breaks SPF, since in all likelihood, the
mailing list's server (the one that sends out the message to all
subscribers) isn't listed as an authorized sender for your domain.

Now if your domain's DMARC policy is p=reject (which it is, as Kirill
showed you), then all MTAs that do DMARC filtering will... you guessed
it: reject an email that comes from an unauthorized MX (i.e. that fails
SPF).

I guess that either for this or for some other reason, autistici.org is
blocking mails from @autistici.org that come from somewhere else other
than autisici.org's on MXs. And this includes messages sent by the
mailing list server on your behalf. That's why you don't receive them.

So, apparently no one is banning or censoring you in particular.

P.S.: forward any complaints about SPF, DKIM and DMARC to Google,
Microsoft and other big players that keep pushing for "security"
mechanisms that are designed to make it increasingly difficult not to
use their services.


--