On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:12:51 +0200,
Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> I think that change is appropriate for pf.
>
Brad, Stuart, are you ok with it to -current?
Special in the case that seems that dovecot-2.3 will be around for a quite
long time dues to removed features at 2.4.
> --
> Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
>
> On 20 October 2024 03:59:33 Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com> wrote:
> > On 2024-10-13 5:52 a.m., Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> >> ports@, Brad, Here a backport of small fix for OpenBSD from mine PR
> >> to fix 2.4 branch on
> >> OpenBSD: https://github.com/dovecot/core/pull/224 Right now I can
> >> find in logs a errors like: Fatal: connect(...) failed: Address
> >> already in use not often, like a few times per week. With this fix
> >> which extend FreeBSD's condition to OpenBSD as well, such
> >> errors dissapears. The diff:
> > Seeing as the PR is a bunch of fixes, either way put a brief description
> > at the top of the patch. You might want to look at updating the comment
> > at the very top of lib/net.c to include OpenBSD.
> > for (try = 0;;) { fd = net_connect_ip_once(ip, port, my_ip, sock_type,
> > blocking); if (fd != -1 || try++ >= MAX_CONNECT_RETRIES || (errno !=
> > EADDRNOTAVAIL
> > #if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__) /* busy */ && errno
> > != EADDRINUSE /* pf may cause this if another connection used the same
> > port recently */ && errno != EACCES
> >
No comments:
Post a Comment