On 2024/12/16 19:07, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> If we want to ship some recent libbfd support, I think we should do it
> from devel/binutils. But right now nothing in the ports tree uses
> libbfd, so the easiest way forward is to just drop bfd from devel/gdb.
> I have verified that lang/rust still builds with this diff.
>
> I might also add fixes to the various devel/*/gcc ports at a later
> point, just in case we decide to install libbfd again.
Agreed, this makes sense to me, thanks for tracking it down.
> ok?
OK.
> @info info/bfd.info
> @info info/ctf-spec.info
> @@ -20,16 +9,6 @@ include/symcat.h
> @comment @info info/sframe-spec.info
> @info info/stabs.info
It might make sense to @comment bfd.info as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment