Friday, December 27, 2024

Re: resurrect lang/haxe with pre-packaged opam root

On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 23:08:32 +0100
Christopher Zimmermann <chrisz@openbsd.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 05:29:26PM -0500, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> >On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:52:08 +0100
> >Christopher Zimmermann <chrisz@openbsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 02:05:55PM -0500, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> >> >chrisz@, I would appreciate a look at this approach to handling
> >> >OPAM dependencies during the build.
> >>
> >> I would prefer the opamroot-helper target to be reproducible by
> >> fixing it to a defined commit on opam-repository. This could be
> >> accomlished by downloading a specific snapshot of opam-repository
> >> and pointing opam init to this snapshot.
> >
> >Thanks for your response. Not sure if I understand your response
> >correctly - the opamroot-helper is meant to create the download of
> >the dependencies from OPAM (at least get started) to then build the
> >tarball to be provided at SITES.opamroot when updating the port. This
> >is by necessity a fixed distfile for the ports build.
>
> I'd do versioning of the haxe-opamroot distfile and opam-init like
> this:
>
> COMMIT.opamroot = a66a58b
> SITES.opamroot = https://thfr.info/distfiles/
> DISTFILES.opamroot = haxe-opamroot-${COMMIT.opamroot}.tar.bz2
>
> […]
>
> env OPAMROOT=/tmp/opamroot opam init --no-setup \
> "https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository.git#${COMMIT.opamroot}"

This looks great to have explicit opamroot commit.

>
> I'm building right now on amd64. Have you tested any non-native archs

I only have amd64 available for the foreseeable future. Testing with
other archs would definitely be appreciated.

> ?
>
> Christopher

No comments:

Post a Comment