Yes, you can comment them.
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Kirill A. Korinsky" <kirill@korins.ky>;
Date: Thu, Feb 20, 2025 10:11 PM
To: "Stuart Henderson"<stu@spacehopper.org>;
Cc: "lux"<lx@shellcodes.org>;"ports"<ports@openbsd.org>;
Subject: Re: [maintainer update] security/nuclei 3.2.6 to 3.3.9
Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (8bit)>]
> should those files actually be added, or should they have @comment'ed
> like many of the others in this port?
>
With 'go ahead' from tb@ I had commited it with this files.
Mainly because bin/tmc here misslead me.
What do you think about this? Lu?
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/nuclei/Makefile,v
diff -u -p -r1.4 Makefile
--- Makefile 20 Feb 2025 11:56:37 -0000 1.4
+++ Makefile 20 Feb 2025 14:08:05 -0000
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ COMMENT = fast and customizable vulnera
MODGO_MODNAME = github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v3
MODGO_VERSION = v3.3.9
+REVISION = 0
DISTNAME = nuclei-${MODGO_VERSION}
Index: pkg/PLIST
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/nuclei/pkg/PLIST,v
diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST 20 Feb 2025 11:56:37 -0000 1.3
+++ pkg/PLIST 20 Feb 2025 14:08:59 -0000
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
@comment bin/fuzzplayground
@comment bin/generate-checksum
@comment bin/integration-test
-@bin bin/memogen
+@comment bin/memogen
@bin bin/nuclei
@comment bin/sign-templates
-@bin bin/scan-charts
-@bin bin/signer
-@bin bin/tmc
+@comment bin/scan-charts
+@comment bin/signer
+@comment bin/tmc
--
wbr, Kirill
No comments:
Post a Comment