Re: [maintainer update] security/nuclei 3.2.6 to 3.3.9

On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:55:29 +0100,
Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (8bit)>]
> should those files actually be added, or should they have @comment'ed
> like many of the others in this port?
>

With 'go ahead' from tb@ I had commited it with this files.

Mainly because bin/tmc here misslead me.

What do you think about this? Lu?

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/nuclei/Makefile,v
diff -u -p -r1.4 Makefile
--- Makefile 20 Feb 2025 11:56:37 -0000 1.4
+++ Makefile 20 Feb 2025 14:08:05 -0000
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ COMMENT = fast and customizable vulnera

MODGO_MODNAME = github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v3
MODGO_VERSION = v3.3.9
+REVISION = 0

DISTNAME = nuclei-${MODGO_VERSION}

Index: pkg/PLIST
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/nuclei/pkg/PLIST,v
diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST 20 Feb 2025 11:56:37 -0000 1.3
+++ pkg/PLIST 20 Feb 2025 14:08:59 -0000
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
@comment bin/fuzzplayground
@comment bin/generate-checksum
@comment bin/integration-test
-@bin bin/memogen
+@comment bin/memogen
@bin bin/nuclei
@comment bin/sign-templates
-@bin bin/scan-charts
-@bin bin/signer
-@bin bin/tmc
+@comment bin/scan-charts
+@comment bin/signer
+@comment bin/tmc


--
wbr, Kirill