Re: relax py-pydantic version requirement on py-pydantic-core

I think that, after unlock, we should update both ports to current versions and add a warning comment reminding that they should be kept in sync with each other.

-- 

  Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.

On 7 April 2025 07:31:34 Renaud Allard <renaud@allard.it> wrote:

On 4/5/25 6:30 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:

hi,

while working on an update to py-rio-cogeo, runtime testing blowed

strangely:

geo/py-rasterio/ $rio cogeo --help

Warning: entry point could not be loaded. Contact its author for help.

Traceback (most recent call last):

File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/click_plugins/core.py", line 37, in decorator

group.add_command(entry_point.load())

               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2775, in load

self.require(*args, **kwargs)  # type: ignore[arg-type]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2803, in require

items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, extras=self.extras)

     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 892, in resolve

dist = self._resolve_dist(

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 938, in _resolve_dist

raise VersionConflict(dist, req).with_context(dependent_req)

pkg_resources.ContextualVersionConflict: (pydantic-core 2.27.0 (/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages), Requirement.parse('pydantic-core==2.23.4'), {'pydantic'})

digging further i found the 'hard' requirement here:

/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic-2.9.2.dist-info/METADATA:Requires-Dist: pydantic-core==2.23.4

seems upstream sets hard requirements between both modules, and recently started enforcing it even more:

https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/commit/ea3f18dea95e253d300c0a90095bb7005b1da90b

something to fix/comment in the port for forthcoming updates, but for release

maybe this is ok ?  it fixes 'rio cogeo' here at least, and i dunno what other

ports having an RDEP on pydantic might be affected by that.

That should be OK given we didn't change anything else, so it should not 

affect other ports if they were already working.