Thursday, May 29, 2025

Re: pgpool-II: Update to 4.6.0

ping

On Fri, 2025-05-02 at 15:28 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello ports@,
>
> I'm currently experimenting with a setup where I expect to be using
> pgpool-II. It appears that everything works as expected with the
> update below. The only thing that doesn't seem to work is the new
> wd_monitoring_interfaces_list functionality, for which I don't see
> a direct need for my own setup and which probably needs some
> OpenBSD specific code.
>
> The json_writer.c bit is a bug I hit and got accepted upstream[0]
>
> OK?
>
> martijn@
>
> [0] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgpool2.git;a=commit;h=14c94473b5b59429186d8c65407bcce17a20cf99
>
> diff /usr/ports
> path + /usr/ports
> commit - 0fbcf24b3e32197a3a763c2c08e4480204b0b998
> blob - 7b727f2f1bf26c69a4dc850af2467de70dc34498
> file + databases/pgpool/Makefile
> --- databases/pgpool/Makefile
> +++ databases/pgpool/Makefile
> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> COMMENT= connection pool server for PostgreSQL
>
> -DISTNAME= pgpool-II-3.7.18
> -REVISION= 1
> +DISTNAME= pgpool-II-4.6.0
>
> CATEGORIES= databases
>
> commit - 0fbcf24b3e32197a3a763c2c08e4480204b0b998
> blob - 20e05c1a006ebc4e5571c61db88536c1b0fbd841
> file + databases/pgpool/distinfo
> --- databases/pgpool/distinfo
> +++ databases/pgpool/distinfo
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (pgpool-II-3.7.18.tar.gz) = 0I4zuZYUjHukHw5PWjMLU5Ec1srJTHh3gIewaMjaCX4=
> -SIZE (pgpool-II-3.7.18.tar.gz) = 3447131
> +SHA256 (pgpool-II-4.6.0.tar.gz) = 9oplcUQtfqU7afOddJrUV3kLABgOGbAZ/ILiNbqwcyE=
> +SIZE (pgpool-II-4.6.0.tar.gz) = 5396128
> commit - 0fbcf24b3e32197a3a763c2c08e4480204b0b998
> blob - /dev/null
> file + databases/pgpool/patches/patch-src_include_utils_fe_ports_h (mode 644)
> --- /dev/null
> +++ databases/pgpool/patches/patch-src_include_utils_fe_ports_h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +Index: src/include/utils/fe_ports.h
> +--- src/include/utils/fe_ports.h.orig
> ++++ src/include/utils/fe_ports.h
> +@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> + #error "This file is not expected to be compiled for pgpool utilities only"
> +

No comments:

Post a Comment