On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 23:46:38 +0200
"Omar Polo" <op@omarpolo.com> wrote:
> yaydn@protonmail.com wrote:
> > På fredag 1. august 2025 kl. 17:36, Omar Polo
> > <op@omarpolo.com> skrev:
> >
> > Tested this version on current/amd64. Built and looks good.
> >
> > Think this is a typo:
> >
> > -DSDL_WAYLAND=OON \
> >
> > 'OON' instead of 'ON'. It enabled even so. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> >
> > Also for alphabetical order in LIB_DEPENDS, if important, would be:
> >
> > wayland/wayland \
> > x11/xkbcommon
> >
> > I think.
>
> Thank you for the nits :)
>
> Rafael also noticed that I forgot to regen the patches after updating
> the port.
>
> thfr: this is ok op@ to import if you want :)))
>
Thanks everyone, I will check this on Tuesday when I have time again
and then import or report back.
FYI wayland was disabled based on sdl2 stuff and because I haven't been
setup to test it, and nobody else had requested it yet. I'm generally
happy to enable it and had plans to look into that eventually anyway.
yaydn, feel free to test if you can add wayland support to sdl2
similarly, I would appreciate the help with this.
No comments:
Post a Comment