On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:51:24PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 05:18:55PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:59:47PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > > Here's the diff that reverts the COMPILER addition in libnotify
> > > consumers. It slightly decreases the amounts of deps needed to build
> > > those ports, but as far as I'm concerned, these ports can stay as is
> > > and I'd happily drop the diff.
> > > Kurt, others: thoughts?
> > I don't have strong feelings either way. base-gcc is generally a much
> > quicker compiler than ports-gcc, so it could be a decent time saver
> > on more complex ports. Theoretially reverting them will also give more
> > ports that may still build on the other base-gcc arches that we don't
> > build packages for.
> I prefer reverting but I don't feel strongly about it. The now outdated
> comments should be removed/fixed in any case.
That's a good point. I hadn't thought about the comments. If we're going
to do commits to remove the comment above COMPILER, I think we might as
well revert the COMPILER change too.
--Kurt
No comments:
Post a Comment