Hi / re, I'm not using tree-sitter personally, so it's a bit of a pain to know whether an update brings runtime regressions. If you care about tree-sitter support it would be good that Laurent Cheylus (and/or Edd) Cc both you and me for future tree-sitter updates. On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Paco Esteban wrote: > Paco Esteban <paco@e1e0.net> writes: > > > [...] > > Also, I'm not entirely sure about the changes 'make update-plist' made. It > > removes some folders, but there are entries for regular files inside those > > folders, so I guess it's fine (?). It should be fine but it's a bit of a pain. There's zero problem for a directory to be shipped by several packages, alas AFAIK make update-plist tends to strip directories if they already are shipped by a dep. Right now I'm not sure which deps are shipping eg share/emacs/site-lisp but anyway, it feels like needless churn for update-plist to strip these entries. Also it looks like update-plist moves %%pgtk%% to a mid-file location because it appears right after a !%%no_x11%% entry. Moving %%pgtk%% before !%%no_x11%% and voila, make update-plist leaves it in place. Just an update-plist quirk, I guess. Anyway... > Updated diff with the PLIST change removed, as per jca@'s request. ok jca@ for post-unlock, also since 7.9 ships the same emacs and tree-sitter versions a backport ought to be useful. -- jca
No comments:
Post a Comment