On 2026/04/18 14:00, Volker Schlecht wrote: > On 4/18/26 11:43 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2026/04/17 21:33, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > > FWIW: It's CVE-2025-53367 > > > > > > Unbuntu has the best writeup I could find in 2 minutes: > > > https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-53367 > > > > "This issue has been patched in version 3.5.29." > > > > I'm not seeing anything that looks particularly worrying in the > > 3.5.28->3.5.29 diff, and there are some other improvements we don't > > have in patches, want to give this a spin? > > Had that (sans AUTOCONF_VERSION) in my list of diffs for after release :-) > > Yesterday I shied back from confirming that some of the patches fixing > security issues and which still apply, are all covered in 3.5.29 > Everything built ok, btw. The CVE numbers listed in the comments in old patches are listed as being fixed in 3.5.29, though I see the DjVuPort.{cpp,h} changes are not present upstream (and still carried in patches in Debian). However if I try the PoC from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943411 with any of (3.5.28 with current patches, 3.5.29 as sent, 3.5.29 with DjVuPort patches reinstated) I get the same: ddjvu: [1-12517] Malformed INCL chunk. Slashes, backslashes, or colons are not allowed. ddjvu: Unexpected End Of File. ddjvu: Cannot decode document.
No comments:
Post a Comment