On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:21:48PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:44:55PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > It annoys me that chrome doesn't start on screen 9 like firefox does.
> > (Especially since it takes a few seconds to start, so I'm always surprised
> > when the window finally appears and disrupts my current screen.)
> > Easily fixed.
> Which rules to add to or remove from upstream's set as well as the
> specified tags have great potential for bike shedding.
>
> Since dwm is designed to be patched and recompiled for personal taste,
> I tend to avoid such changes in our port and leave them to users.
>
> On the other hand, the firefox rule has been there for ages and doing
> the same with chromium makes sense consistency wise.
>
> That said, no objections from me, but please refrain from further
> config patches or send them directly upstream.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
Should we add Iridium too then to stay consistent with chromium and
firefox? From statistics[1] of my small samples (17 amd64 6.4-current
machines), I see 5 iridium, 7 chromium and 13 firefox installed.
[1] https://pkgstat-openbsd.perso.pw/index.php?osversion=6.4-current&arch=amd64
No comments:
Post a Comment