On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:29:47PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
| > Sadly, no :-(
| >
| > But I should be able to accomplish what I need using rc.firsttime and
| > a tiny bit of hackery.
|
| Sadly, no :-(
|
| What I was aiming for was to have the newly installed machines come
| up with a 2GB MFS /tmp and a ~20GB /var/tmp. But MFS /tmp really
| needs help in the system boot scripts.
Why? I've been running with MFS /tmp for *years* on several machines.
This indeed required some changes when /var/tmp was changed into a
symlink to /tmp, but that was really no issue at all.
There's very little difference between a /tmp on disk and a /tmp in
RAM (through mfs): both get mounted during boot at the same time.
[weerd@pom] $ grep /tmp /etc/fstab
swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,noatime,async,nosuid,-s=8388608
[weerd@pom] $ df -h /tmp
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
mfs:12547 3.9G 227M 3.5G 6% /tmp
| The critical part for us is that /var/tmp not overwhelm /var, and
| we can get that with the current scheme by sizing /tmp accordingly.
Having /var/tmp not overwhelm /var is accomplished by having /var/tmp
symlink to /tmp (assuming /var and /tmp are on separate filesystems).
If you need more room in /var/tmp then you want to assign to your MFS
/tmp, then you need a different solution - but that's probably
something that can also be solved in a different way (don't use
/var/tmp for temporary storage, but another (dedicated) location for
whatever needs to write so much there).
Cheers,
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
No comments:
Post a Comment