Re: [NEW] textproc/py-recommonmark

On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:34:13PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:

> Duh, indeed.

> >> Also, setting MODPY_EGG_VERSION is useless or I'm missing something?

> > It's not necessary if using the GH_* tags, but if there is intention to
> > move it to PyPI in the future, it makes sense.

> The package started as a MODPY_PI port, but I indeed decided to go for
> the github repo to get more tests to run. It's not perfect yet, as I'm
> not sure I understand the cause for the "KeyError: 'refdoc'" tracebacks.

Ah. I assumed that was what it was, but even the github tarball seems to
leave out some files. I was getting errors about an index.md that seems
to be in the current master branch but not in the 0.5.0 GH tarball. So
I was unsure.

> Updated tarball attached, diff below. Thanks for your help.

This new version, OK kmos@

You're welcome on the help :)

--Kurt

> --8<--
> diff -pruN py-recommonmark.old/Makefile py-recommonmark/Makefile
> --- py-recommonmark.old/Makefile Sat Jun 29 07:24:49 2019
> +++ py-recommonmark/Makefile Sun Jun 30 12:21:24 2019
> @@ -2,10 +2,13 @@
>
> COMMENT = markdown parser for docutils
>
> -MODPY_EGG_VERSION = 0.5.0
> +MODPY_EGG_VERSION = 0.5.0
> +# Using github autogenerated tarball because pypi tarballs don't ship
> +# files needed by tests.
> GH_ACCOUNT = readthedocs
> GH_PROJECT = recommonmark
> GH_TAGNAME = ${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}
> +PKGNAME = py-recommonmark-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}
>
> CATEGORIES = textproc devel
>
> @@ -20,7 +23,6 @@ MODPY_SETUPTOOLS = Yes
> RUN_DEPENDS = textproc/py-commonmark${MODPY_FLAVOR} \
> textproc/py-docutils${MODPY_FLAVOR} \
> textproc/py-sphinx${MODPY_FLAVOR}
> -TEST_DEPENDS = ${RUN_DEPENDS}
>
> FLAVORS = python3
> FLAVOR ?=
> -->8--
>
>


>
> --
> jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE