Unfortunately, switching to vmx(4) did *not* do the trick
-Heinrich
> On 29. Nov 2020, at 22:38, Heinrich Rebehn <Heinrich.Rebehn@rebehn.net> wrote:
>
> Some things I forgot:
>
> All interfaces are UP
> pf(4) ist disabled
> bridge0 sees a bunch of lladdrs on em0 and one on em1, which is that of "A"
>
> -Heinrich
>
>
>> On 29. Nov 2020, at 22:29, Heinrich Rebehn <Heinrich.Rebehn@rebehn.net <mailto:Heinrich.Rebehn@rebehn.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am trying to setup an OpenBSD 6.7 virtual machine under VMware ESXi 6.7 to use as a filtering bridge between two virtual networks. I enabled promiscuous mode for both virtual switches.
>> One network is the VMnet network, which is connected to the "outside world".
>>
>> "A" ——> "B" ——> "R"
>>
>> "A" is a test machine 192.168.1.152
>> "B" is the bridge No IP. em0 connects to R, em1 connects to A
>> "R" is the router provided by the hoster 192.168.1.1
>>
>> The addresses are only examples, the actual addresses a public IPs.
>>
>> When A tries to ping R, ist sends an arp request for R's lladdr. R responds with its lladdr. Tcpdump on R's em1 suggests that it is sent out on the virtual network. However, A does not see the arp reply, hence ping(8) fails.
>>
>> What am I missing? While browsing the mailing list archive, I just saw that vmx(4) might be a better choice, but I had not yet time to try it out.
>>
>>
>> Any other known issues around bridge(4) or promiscuous mode under ESXi ?
>>
>> Thanks for any insights,
>>
>> Heinrich
No comments:
Post a Comment