I did not say that. I did not see that you in particular, or anyone in
this mailing list, make this work.
As a user, I simply suggest creating an RSS channel for security
advisories and *even* I offer myself to help.
The intention behind was to improve OpenBSD web. Simply.
I want to thank Brian and Hiltjo who gave me positives answers with
resolutive comments.
I missed some guide or collaboration in order to incorporate this change
or at least talk about technical pros and cons.
Perhaps it's me but I perceived some kind or rudeness in some responses.
Oh! Come on! Why don't we concentrate in teach reasons and not in "I
don't want to move my position". Do you think this kind of answer would
benefit the project?
Do you treat people in reality like in the web?
Xavier
A 22.05.2023 15:11, Theo de Raadt escrigué:
> I am not going to do any of this work you want.
>
> Good bye.
>
>
>
> Xavier <somenxavier@posteo.net> wrote:
>
>> "Theo de Raadt" said:
>>
>> > I'd be thrilled to do less work on errata!
>> > How about we do RSS, and stop making errata?
>> > We can do static RSS.
>> > Configure and forget.
>>
>> I don't know if you say it seriously. If you do, I think it's the
>> best. Perhaps you could write some semantic file and convert them to
>> desired format (html, RSS, etc.).
>> I saw the www repo
>> (https://github.com/openbsd/www/blob/38884496ed89e3041dcaaeadaf21e20a918581ee/errata73.html)
>> and it seems you make things manually. Don't you think an static site
>> generator or some kind of tool to make things more automatic (I'm
>> thinking in mandoc conversion because all the web is really a big
>> documentation project)?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Xavier
No comments:
Post a Comment