Tuesday, August 08, 2023

Re: new www/shiori

On Tue, 08 Aug 2023, Paco Esteban wrote:

> On Mon, 07 Aug 2023, A Tammy wrote:
>
> >
> > On 8/7/23 13:30, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > > Hi ports@,
> > >
> > > This is a new port for shiori: https://github.com/go-shiori/shiori
> > >
> > > from pkg/DESCR:
> > >
> > > Shiori is a simple bookmarks manager written in the Go language. Intended as
> > > a simple clone of Pocket. You can use it as a command line application or as
> > > a web application.
> > >
> > > I had to make a bit of a dance to make it work as a system daemon.
> > > The configuration is partly done via command line arguments and
> > > environment variables. In order to be able to use those, I moved the
> > > binary to /usr/local/libexec and created a wrapper script that loads the
> > > variables from a config file (/etc/shiori.conf) if it exists and calls
> > > the actual binary (thank you semarie@ for your help there).
> >
> > Not aimed at shiori in particular but I wanted to talk about how we are
> > loading environment variables in rcctl in general.
> >
> > Until now the recommended approach was to put the variables in the
> > /etc/login.conf.d/<service> file (like with the step-ca port), while
> > I've also seen daemons who had to write these wrapper like scripts to
> > load environment variables from config files (I did the same for all
> > jitsi ports).
> >
> > Do we want to keep this fragmented approach or try to some up with a
> > different method for loading/setting these variables?
> > While not the ideal model, systemd allows setting environment variables
> > in its unit file or allows setting a file from which to load environment
> > variables (the EnvironmentFile variable) and openrc loads variables from
> > /etc/conf.d/<service-name>.
>
> I would prefer not to use the wrapper script to be honest. I did not
> think about the login.conf(5) approach. Will change the port to use
> that instead. It will probably solve the rcctl stop problem too.
>
> In any case, a simple config file that can be sourced is easier to
> handle than the login.conf(5) syntax (I personally never liked it, but
> that may be only me).
>
> I'm in favor of something similar to what openrc does. We could go with
> something similar, predefined folder to put a file named as the service
> that will be sourced before start. I can take a look at rc.subr and
> start the long bikeshedding process that this will likely trigger, but I
> think is worth it.
>
> Of course, I'm open to suggestions.
>
> Thanks Aisha.

Find attached the updated version that removes the wrapper script and
makes use of login classes.

ok to import ?

--
Paco Esteban.
0x5818130B8A6DBC03

No comments:

Post a Comment