I don't know, I told you, all I worked with are what you guys told me, what
made sense and what I could found online
I did not read code because I am not OS dev and don't have as much time as I
would like, so this is the best I could do, Theo didn't tell me if I was wrong
or right, he told me to make changes to source code and he is out.. does that
mean I am right or to just read source code?
I maybe make no sense always, but neither do you guys
I am as friendly as I can be, I said what I tried and didn't try, and who I am
and who I am not
- best regards, I hope we can make friendships regardless of out differences
and knowledge, enemies are easy to make
On Tue, January 30, 2024 4:08 pm, Bruce Jagid wrote:
> If you actually thought you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't
> feel the need to insert "I'm not an OS Dev" after everything you say
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:05 AM <beecdaddict@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>
>
>> oh, Theo, if I were to start changing thing to the perfect OS security-wise,
>> it wouldn't even look like OpenBSD code anymore, but OpenBSD still best
>> what world have to offer
>>
>> so do you agree with my logic? at least give me that at least tell me is
>> this how things stand FD-wise/limit-wise/whatever, you probably know the
>> best out of all I e-mailed with
>>
>> no attempt yet,in future I hope,it's not a I am too lazy reason
>>
>> On Tue, January 30, 2024 3:58 pm, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>>> beecdaddict@danwin1210.de wrote:
>>>
>>>> I know system shares all resources including FDs
>>>> as far as I know there's what kernel/OS needs and is using and the rest
>> of
>>>> users including but not limited to staff and daemon users/programs like
>>>> i2pd all I was wondering is the limit or amount of FDs and other
>> resources
>>>> the rest of users of daemon can use in my head is a total amount which
>>>> apparently is unknown (I have been told why, but how can anyone work
>> with
>>>> that? it's like relying on someone mentally unstable) which is then
>> devided,
>>>> kernel/OS gets all that it needs, users and daemons get the rest which
>> IS
>>
>>>> DIVIDED (in my head) until there is no more to
>>>> divide/give away/share am I close?
>>>>
>>>> okay maybe not make all available resources to 1 program is not how it
>>>> works but why not if that's the only programs that's running? I do not
>>>> understand if it's even possible to do what I'm asking or questioning,
>> I am
>>
>>>> not a OS dev because of reasons, but I like discussing such because I
>> like
>>>> OS-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and just because what I ask isn't how it works doesn't mean it's bad?
>>>> it could mean
>>>
>>> You've been provided with all the source code.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Where is your attempt to change things?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment