Re: (changed subject) Re: net/i2pd: FD talk and limits and ISP routers too weak maybe

Probably worth mentioning here, since it's apparently not obvious enough:

Changing everything all at once can never be progress - and
"discussions" with that aim are noise, at best (wholesale destruction
if attempted).

--
Raul


On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:09 AM Bruce Jagid <brucejagid@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you actually thought you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't
> feel the need to insert "I'm not an OS Dev" after everything you say
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:05 AM <beecdaddict@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>
> > oh, Theo, if I were to start changing thing to the perfect OS
> > security-wise,
> > it wouldn't even look like OpenBSD code anymore, but OpenBSD still best
> > what
> > world have to offer
> >
> > so do you agree with my logic? at least give me that
> > at least tell me is this how things stand FD-wise/limit-wise/whatever, you
> > probably know the best out of all I e-mailed with
> >
> > no attempt yet,in future I hope,it's not a I am too lazy reason
> >
> > On Tue, January 30, 2024 3:58 pm, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > beecdaddict@danwin1210.de wrote:
> > >
> > >> I know system shares all resources including FDs
> > >> as far as I know there's what kernel/OS needs and is using and the rest
> > of
> > >> users including but not limited to staff and daemon users/programs like
> > >> i2pd all I was wondering is the limit or amount of FDs and other
> > resources
> > >> the rest of users of daemon can use in my head is a total amount which
> > >> apparently is unknown (I have been told why, but how can anyone work
> > with
> > >> that? it's like relying on someone mentally unstable) which is then
> > devided,
> > >> kernel/OS gets all that it needs, users and daemons get the rest which
> > IS
> > >> DIVIDED (in my head) until there is no more to
> > >> divide/give away/share am I close?
> > >>
> > >> okay maybe not make all available resources to 1 program is not how it
> > >> works but why not if that's the only programs that's running? I do not
> > >> understand if it's even possible to do what I'm asking or questioning,
> > I am
> > >> not a OS dev because of reasons, but I like discussing such because I
> > like
> > >> OS-dev
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> and just because what I ask isn't how it works doesn't mean it's bad? it
> > >> could mean
> > >
> > > You've been provided with all the source code.
> > >
> > >
> > > Where is your attempt to change things?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >