On 2024/07/01 22:09, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the recent update to tor-browser-13.5 on amd64 -current broke it for me.
> It aborts right after start with SIGILL. Doesn't matter if I use an existing
> config or a fresh one.
>
> $ egdb /usr/local/lib/tor-browser/tor-browser
> Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/tor-browser/tor-browser...
> (No debugging symbols found in /usr/local/lib/tor-browser/tor-browser)
> (gdb) r
> Starting program: /usr/local/lib/tor-browser/tor-browser
> [New thread 600821]
> [New thread 465054]
> [New thread 362995]
> [New thread 178360]
> [New thread 381574]
> [New thread 412107]
> [New thread 509418]
> [New thread 420661]
>
> Thread 1 received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> 0x00000f503c91d3a0 in ?? ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00000f503c91d3a0 in ?? ()
> #1 0x00000f4ff04c0c3f in js::jit::MaybeEnterJit(JSContext*, js::RunState&) () from /usr/local/lib/tor-browser/libxul.so.9.0
>
> I have a 11th gen Intel CPU with BTI so it might be related to that...
Based on the function name, SIGILL, and cpu that is quite likely.
The way to be sure is to run under ktrace and check kdump, on a
12th gen Intel machine I have
67324 tor-browser PSIG SIGILL caught handler=0x3d79d66aa40 mask=0<> code=ILL_BTCFI addr=0x3d80b3fa3a0 trapno=21
so yes.
mozilla.port.mk is setting USE_NOBTCFI so it's supposed to be built
with the relevant linker flags to turn this off, but perhaps there's
something in tor-browser build which is overriding that..
firefox-esr (also 115-based) *is* working correctly on this machine.
No comments:
Post a Comment